User talk:Untifler

AfD nomination of 2008 Kazan explosion

An article that you have been involved in editing, 2008 Kazan explosion, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Kazan explosion. Thank you. Matthiasb-DE (talk) 20:08, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any particular reason why you don't want to merge this with Kazan? It is a rather short stub, after all...—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure, it will be larger as soon as investigation results will be found. More over, there is some unclear about three missed persons. And finally there are a lot of such short articles, for example: Chechnya Spetsnaz base explosion. --Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also:ә? Ә!) 18:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the majority of the "delete" votes came from people who do not consider the event to be notable. I can see now that it is not the case, but if you could add a few more sources to the article (preferrably in English), I'll gladly oppose the nomination and explain why the notability guidelines (at least in my view) are being met.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tatar Wikipedia

Hi, you seem to be a sysop (and bureaucrat) at the Tatar Wikipedia. There are several pages in tt:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion which have been requested for deletion. Could you look through the list and delete the pages (if appropriate)? Thanks in advance, -- Prince Kassad (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you do the same for Abkhaz Wikipedia? -- Prince Kassad (talk) 12:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 20 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1917 Kazan Gunpowder Plant fire, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Maxim_(talk) 16:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Latinization in USSR

I was wondering if you know specifically which languages had their first alphabets created during the Soviet Latinization campaign? I think such a list would be a great addition to the article. Thanks! Otebig (talk) 15:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vkontakte

А какое у неё должно быть правильное название?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:37, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Тьфу ты, не заметил, что в названии опечатка :) Готово, перенёс.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Изучить историю страницы перед тем как её восстановить я поленился, но теперь вижу, что всё не так просто. Поставил на DRV; прокомментируй, пожалуйста.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Проставь, пожалуйста, источники в этой статье. Иначе её скорее всего удалят обратно. У меня в данный момент нет времени их искать, а дело срочное. Спасибо.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:15, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Review for Vkontakte.ru

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Vkontakte.ru. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Sochi conflict

Hi Untifler, I'll try to work towards the improvement of the article, but I'm not sure I'll be able to do that in the next few weeks. Best regards,--Kober^Talk 16:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dato Khujadze

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Dato Khujadze, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 05:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of KGB (band)

A tag has been placed on KGB (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tnxman307 (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposals for closing of Tatar Wikipedia

Добрый день!

Хочу обратить ваше внимание вот на это Don Alessandro (talk) 15:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Untifler, v private yaziship bulami sinen bn? Kirmen (talk) 15:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bula, untifler et yandex ru'ga yazigisçi!--Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also:ә? Ә!) 17:32, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Как обещал когда-то

ать, два, три, четыре, пять, шесть, сем. Вот собственна дошли руки. Козу и еще три остальных допишу через дня три. --Kuban Cossack 19:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Геральдика

Герб Казани из en.wiki был удалён, потому что то же самое изображение с тем же самым названием был на Commons, а из Commons его удалили где-то в марте за отсутствием лицензии. Флаг с Commons удалили также по причине отсутствия лицензии. Если что-то ещё откуда-то исчезло, то, подозреваю, по той же самой причине...—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Я не знаю. Поскольку на Commons я не админ, то и посмотреть, что там было до удаления не в состоянии :(—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:32, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hello Untifler. You seem to be quite knowledgeable on the subject of the Volga-Ural region of Russia, perhaps you could help me out with something. The Volgaic Finns article is quite a mess. It is largely unsourced, and it was moved last November form Mordvin people due to this comment. I'm not sure if it should have been moved or not, but to the best of my knowledge, the Mordvins consist of two groups: Erzya Mordvins, who speak Erzya, and Moksha Mordvins, who speak Moksha. What I'm not sure about is whether these two groups recognize the Mordvin term (which they are labeled as according to the Russian census), or whether they consider themselves two distinct ethnic groups. Do you know what the history is of the term "Mordvin"? Do you think that the article should be moved back? I noticed today that a Erzya people article was created a few months ago (there was already a Moksha people page). However, I honestly don't know enough about the subject to make significant contributions to these articles. Perhaps this is similar to the Mingrelians and Svans who are sup-groups of the Georgian people. ~~Another question is why Udmurts aren't mentioned in the article, despite the fact that they are a Finnic people as well.~~ Perhaps you could help me fix up the page, because I'm not quite sure what to do at this point. Thanks. Khoi khoi 02:34, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also see what another user points out at Talk:Moksha people. Khoi khoi 02:51, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fooof, this dispute is rather known for me. First of all, it is absolutely incorrect to move Morvins to Volgaic Finns, due to classification:

There are two general branches of the Finnic peoples in the region: Uralian Finns: Udmurts and Komi (1) and Volga Finns, including Mordvin peoples and Mari peoples, as well as Muroma, Meshchera and Merya in the Middle Ages (2). Volga Finns, in turn, are divided into Northern - Mari peoples (Hill, Meadow and Eastern; possibly this group also included Merya) and southern Volga Finns , which are Mordvin peoples Moksha and Erzya, and three subgroups, which are also belong either to Moksha or to Eryza; historically this group included Muroma and Meshchera, (however, it is disputed). The classification is such, but I m not sure that all terms I use are correct...

So, as you see, Mokshans and Eryzas are included firstly to the Mordvin peoples, and only then Mordvin peoples are included to the Volga Finns. Another dispute is "are Mokshans and Erzyans separate people, or subgroups only"? I really dont know, what POV prevails now. Surely, both POVs exist, and it should be mentioned in all articles. As for Maris, they are used to be divided to @subgroups@, not "peoples". Mainly, the concept of "two peoples" and disuse of "Mordvin" term is likely to Mordvin (sorry, Moksha and Erzya) schlars themselves,

As result, This page should be switched back to "Mordvins" or "Mordvin peoples", as this term is widely used, and "Volgaic Finns" should be rewritten to include more about Maris, and historical Volga Finnic peoples.--Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also:ә? Ә!) 08:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I have moved the page back and created a new Volga Finns article. I copied some of your comment at Talk:Mordvins (hope you don't mind). Thanks again. Khoi khoi 20:00, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect! I have nothing against it. )) --Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also:ә? Ә!) 20:28, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Untifler.

Don`t really wanna copy all this discussion but please visit [1] and look at the new comments. I believe you undestand the point of this old no-way-out discussion. Thank you--Numulunj pilgae 14:03, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Пгтs

Привет! Поскольку Арск нынче город, категория Category:Urban-type settlements in Tatarstan теперь пустая. Можешь написать что-нибудь базовое про любой пгт Татарстана, чтобы категория не пустовала? Спасибо!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?);

А где ты смотришь "актуальный" список городов и пгт? (А то с этой реформой саамоупрравления я окончательно запутался, что у нас пгт, что просто поселок, что город ))) --Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also:ә? Ә!) 06:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Вообще, я слежу за законодательством, но вот этот список продолжаю актуализировать как обычно, так что там всё должно быть в целом правильно.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 12:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

один есть )) --Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also:ә? Ә!) 07:54, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:31, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shugurovo

Привет! Такие вещи лучше всего искать в законодательстве (если, как в данном случае, изменение произошло относительно недавно) или в старых справочниках по административно-территориальному делению (если изменение произошло до 1990-х гг.). Я добавил дату и ссылку на соответствующее постановление. Если не секрет, откуда ты брал остальную информацию? Можешь тоже добавить источник и удалить {{refimprove}}?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:21, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trialeti Ossetia

Hi. I have nominated the article for deletion. Although I consider the article to be a good faith work on your part, I have never heard of this irredentist concept before and there are no scholarly sources available to render the entry viable. Thanks for your understanding, --Kober^Talk 15:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ruslan Chagaev

Защищать пока не буду (поскольку semi предназначен для временной защиты статей от вандализма с разных IP, а тут у вас просто спор по мелкому вопросу), но за развитием прослежу. Для гражданина Узбекистана, разумеется, имя на узбекском указано быть должно. Что касается спеллинга, то поскольку такой же спеллинг используется в узбекской вики, то твоя версия совершенно правильна. Статью, кстати, тоже, наверное, имеет смысл переименовать (в "Ruslan Chagayev")?

А запросить защиту можно на WP:RFP. Я не против, чтобы меня спрашивали напрямую, но если я в оффлайне, то через RFP может быть быстрее.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:07, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Менять вроде бы не надо: такое расхождение узбекского с английским, а также немецкого с испанским, похоже может говорить только о том, что текущий спеллинг используется "по традиции" )) Почему Узбекское написание различается с английским -видимо потому, что он в спорте с 1995 года, до реформы узбекского алфавита.

Не, лучше через тебя. Вдруг что более дельное посоветуешь. ))) --Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also:ә? Ә!) 14:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Насчёт детального — даже если фамилия транслитерировалась с кириллицы, то по правилам романизации узбекского языка (BGN/PCGN) всё равно будет "Chagayev". Откуда взялось написание "Chagaev" я не знаю. Есть идеи?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:09, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Может быть посчитали что раз он не узбек, то и правила должны быть другие? Вообще, имена спортсменов и правила их спеллинга для меня вообще загадка. Взять хотя бы Ildar Fatchullin,который никакой не Фачуллин, а Фатхуллин.--Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also:ә? Ә!) 15:17, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Для спортсменов часто используется французская транслитерация (с Фатхуллиным, по-видимому, так оно и было), поскольку французский часто является основным языком спортивных федераций. Это далеко не всегда значит, что в английском должен использоваться именно такой вариант. В данном конкретном случае, однако, трудно о чём-то спорить, поскольку WP:UZB у нас не существует. Оттуда, наверное, и надо начать (если захочешь заняться, я с удовольствием пришлю выдержку из BGN/PCGN касательно узбекского языка).—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:25, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Фатхуллина вроде даже не в французской, а какой-то немецкой транслитерацией исковеркали )) Чесно говоря, на википедию щас времени почти не хватает, так что, боюсь, узбекам ничем помочь не смогу. Да и собственно, какие там могут быть проблемы? Использовать их имена на латинице, за исключением устоявшихся исключений... и все ) с Чагаевым замятица вышла, поскольку тут перемешались и узбекское, и русское, и родное татарское имя...--Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also:ә? Ә!) 16:53, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Locator maps

Просто любой контурной карты для этого недостаточно. Нужен вот такой позиционный шаблон, а для шаблона нужна специальная позиционная карта (в ортографической проекции и с известными координатами её краёв (верх-низ-лево-право)). Моих способностей, к сожалению, на создание такой карты явно не хватает.

Когда карта появится, её надо будет прописать в одном из под-шаблонов, используемых {{Infobox Russian city}}, и тогда локальная карта Татарстана тоже будет появляться в инфобоксе автоматом.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Do you speak Yaghnobi?

If you do, please tell me the Yaghnobi word for the hoopoe. Thank you. Eliko (talk) 09:08, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Siberian Tatar language listed at RfD

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Siberian Tatar language. Since you had some involvement with the Siberian Tatar language redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Cunard (talk) 02:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC) Cunard (talk) 02:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nurlatsky Districts

Привет! Я тут слегка покрошил Nurlatsky District, Tatar ASSR (which used to be under "Nurlat-Achasyrsky District"). Там у тебя было написано, что район переименовали в "Нурлатский" 1 августа, а вот года не было. Можешь добавить? Я этой даты не нашёл. Также я убрал инфобокс — слишком уж в нём много пустых и не подходящих к ситуации полей (муниципальное деление, например). Собственно инфобокс я добавил себе в список дел, чтобы пустые поля попросту не показывались, но руки до этого могут дойти ещё не скоро. Или же для советских районов можно сделать отдельный шаблон, хотя пока надобности в нём особой не вижу (сколько у нас таких статей? пара-тройка?). У меня вообще философия разрабатывать шаблоны по мере накопления и систематизации материала, а то потом приходится каждую неделю всё заново переделывать. Anyhoo, комментарии приветствуются. Как жизнь вообще? Чего-то тебя в последнее время не видно. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Привет! Подправил. Год был тот же самый, 1927 )) щас появляюсь только на русской Вике, и в основном по вопросам ru:Википедия:Проект:Внесение символов алфавитов народов России в Юникод. Тут редко бываю - сменил место основной деятельности и времени почти не осталось :) --Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also:ә? Ә!) 18:57, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ну вот, man down. И так народу мало. Возвращайся, а то с кем я буду административное деление Татарстана до FL подымать?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:03, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't ignore my question

Eliko (talk) 01:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am NOT the Yaghnobi speaker. And its unlikely you find some on the English wikipedia. Try to do it at Tajik wikipedia.

I can help you with Tatar for the word you rquested. it will be һөдһөд (hödhöd). --Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also:ә? Ә!) 16:32, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK Eliko (talk) 22:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Bol7n.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Bol7n.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 13:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Parizh_tower.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Parizh_tower.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:30, 30 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:30, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Parizh tower.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Parizh tower.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Acem

A tag has been placed on Acem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Gerardw (talk) 00:59, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Borjomi wildfire

I have nominated Borjomi wildfire, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borjomi wildfire. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Russavia ^Dialogue 13:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Horde

Hi. Please watch Golden Horde. A user is adding the Turkish language to the first sentence of the article, which is totally irrelevant. He is also ignoring the discussion. Tājik (talk) 01:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Front of the Russian Civil War

Hello, thank you for noticing me about the template concerning the "Southern Front". Would you mind editing that part yourself? I only found the template in the Southern Front of the Russian Civil War-article, and I put them everywhere for a better lay-out on Wikipedia. However, I am pretty sure that you know more about the Russian Civil War than I, so do with those templates whatever you think that is right.Jeff5102 (talk) 19:49, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Söyembikä of Kazan

Done.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 12:42, May 18, 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chuvash statehood

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Chuvash statehood. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuvash statehood. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi

hello. My mother's ancestors are from chuvashia and Im interested into know some of it's history. Unfortunately I dont know russian, and actually I was born in south america. If it would be possible, I woudl appreciate some orientation. thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Farkasven (talk • contribs) 00:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Accent mark for Cyrillic

Hi, our requests to add the accent mark to Edittools was finally approved: see here and here. Regards, Capmo (talk) 11:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Сekcek

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Untifler! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 144 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Murtaza Rakhimov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
İlsur Metşin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Abdulla Dubin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:46, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Xat.com

I have nominated Xat.com, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xat.com. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Q ^{T C} 01:45, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship in Abkhaz Wikipedia

Мшыбзиа — İsənmesez — Hello! I'm now learning Abkhazian and a member of Small Wiki Monitoring Team. Thus I'd like to request sysop status in the Apsua Avikipedia (btw. I'm now an Admin of Bashkir Wikipedia too). How could I request it and what's required? Regards, --V. (talk) 10:18, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Wahapov.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wahapov.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 19:47, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Cihanov.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cihanov.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 20:10, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yaxin.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Yaxin.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kharam Ulus

Да чего тут бороться, ставьте на удаление и все дела. Источник проверили? Проверили. Оказалась неправда. Другие источники указаны? Не указаны. Найти другие источники пытались? Пытались. То есть в чистом остатке имеем отсутствие источников (unsourced) и невозможность проверить факты (unverifiable). Прямая дорога этой статье в AfD.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); June 18, 2010; 16:49 (UTC)

Alıp

Hi Untifler,

In 2005 you had created the article Alıp. Fine article, but I wonder if the name can be moved to Alp (without the wovel I.) Have a nice day. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:48, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely it is possible: Alp is already used as disambiguation page. --Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also:ә? Ә!) 15:29, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Tuq2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Tuq2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:16, 29 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:16, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mahmud Khan

The article Mahmud Khan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:AUTHOR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Triwbe (talk) 14:08, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gäp

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Gäp, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:31, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gäp for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Gäp, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gäp until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Zilantmetro.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Zilantmetro.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:29, 19 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tatarstan and the goats

А, добро пожаловать обратно :) За дополнение спасибо —я его обязательно почикаю, но так, по мелочи. В целом очень неплохо. Кое-что я по АТД Татарстана тоже нашёл, но только после 1930-х гг., т.е. про кантоны у меня ничего нет.

Козью слободу перенёс; теперь на Kozya Sloboda нужен дизамбиг. Можешь сделать?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); December 6, 2010; 14:36 (UTC)

Вопрос: в 60-е гг. "some of the districts were split", но их количество уменьшилось до 37? Где-то ошибка.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); December 6, 2010; 15:39 (UTC)

Merged конечно же ) Дизамбиг сделал. Кстати. есть какиенибудь наметки про общесоюзные етденции в укрупнеии или измельчении районов?--Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also:ә? Ә!) 12:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Гдетобылогдетобыло :) Хотя, наверное, одним текстом не было; так, там кусочек, здесь кусочек. Районы эти то дробили, то укрупняли, то опять дробили, то опять укрупняли. Надо, в общем, всё это собирать и полировать. Если найду что-нибудь цельное, поделюсь.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); December 7, 2010; 13:53 (UTC)

Ага, ответил, и взгляд упал на книжную полку... "Административно-территориальное устройство России. История и современность", под ред. А.В. Пыжикова, Москва, "Олма-Пресс", 2003, которую я всё никак не дочитаю. Там несколько главок про тенденции АТУ в СССР по декадам, в т.ч. есть немного и про делёж районов.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); December 7, 2010; 13:58 (UTC)

U+A790

Hi -- I uploaded svg's of U+A790 ( and ) to commons. See Ꞑ. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 04:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That's great! Could you also add link to this page to the N-diacritics template, appearing in the bottom of the article. I can't find a way to do this. --Üñţïf̣ļëŗ (see also:ә? Ә!) 07:45, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done (that took a while...) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 10:24, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ide-Ural

Semied for two weeks.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); February 25, 2011; 14:34 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Yaxin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Yaxin.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 20:23, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:IttifaQ Balki 2007.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:IttifaQ Balki 2007.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:02, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of İttifaQ

The article İttifaQ has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Milburn (talk) 14:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ğabdulla Tuqay

Done.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); May 20, 2011; 13:25 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Ghiasetdin of Kazan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bolgar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link in article 'Lyuli'

Hi. The article 'Lyuli' has a dead link that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it?

Dead: http://www.goacom.org/overseas-digest/ImAsy&Race%20(EU)/Cases04/russia04.htm

You added this in March 2007.
The bot tested this link on 28 March, 30 March, 1 April, 5 April, 7 April, 11 April and today, but it never worked.
The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

This link is marked with {{Dead link}} in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!

PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots |deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 11:49, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indigenous districts

The concept is definitely real. I need to check my library to see if I have enough material for a stub, though. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); May 22, 2012; 14:04 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Majit Gafuri, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bashkir, Kazakh and Galia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:51, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

are you still an active editor?

Dear Untifler - we need to have a discussion about the "Battle of Samara Bend" article, please, if you are still "here." Thanks. HammerFilmFan (talk) 21:33, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Xabib Yunich

The article Xabib Yunich has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Xabib Yunich – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about optional subject area that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shrigley (talk) 20:18, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Xat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:02, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your admin status on ab.wiki

Hello. I'm a steward. A new policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc.) was adopted by community consensus recently. According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing of administrators' activity on wikis with no inactivity policy.

You meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for 2 years) on ab.wikipedia, where you are an administrator. Since ab.wikipedia does not have an own administrators' rights review process, the global one applies.

If you wish to retain your rights, you should notify the community that the stewards sent you this information about your inactivity to discuss the matter. Following your community's discussion, if the community then wants that you keep your rights, please contact the stewards at m:Stewards' noticeboard, and link to the discussion of the local community, where they express their wish to continue to maintain the rights, and demonstrate a continued requirement to maintain these rights.

We stewards will evaluate the responses. If there is no response at all after approximately one month, we will proceed to remove your administrative rights. In cases of doubt, we will evaluate the responses and will refer a decision back to the local community for their comment and review. If you have any questions, please contact us on m:Stewards' noticeboard.

Best regards, --MF-W 01:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Urmançe.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Urmançe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. —Darkwind (talk) 23:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Untifler! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:10, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Untifler. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Untifler~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

03:28, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Untifler. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Untifler. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:TES-in

Template:TES-in has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. PBS (talk) 14:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aidamir Mugu

The article Aidamir Mugu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article about someone far from notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 23:10, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Säydäş.jpg

The file File:Säydäş.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Qarabash" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Qarabash. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 12#Qarabash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. (t · c) buidhe 01:01, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of İttifaQ for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article İttifaQ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/İttifaQ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Josh Milburn (talk) 22:22, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Göbenä" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Göbenä has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 17 § Göbenä until a consensus is reached. Roasted (talk) 18:31, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]